Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you to the presenters.
Your question, Mr. Chairman, is an interesting segue into what I wanted to ask. I'll go first to the ICON Group.
Mr. Kaufman, in your presentation you say that substantial carbon dioxide capture and sequestration won't get off the ground if left to the market alone, and that there is a transitional role for government. Then in your next slide, number seven, you say that carbon capture and sequestration should not be mandated. You touched on this briefly, but I wonder if you could expand, because the estimates I recall were that to do this carbon capture and sequestration you could be looking at upwards of $20 a barrel. I don't know if you have any costs associated with what it would take to capture and sequester the carbon, but while I can see there's a transition if you're left with that kind of a cost on a variable-cost basis—and maybe that's not a variable-cost basis—how can that gap be bridged to the market alone even with some transitional government help?