Yes, okay.
It seems to me that we're on to something here. Perhaps we could have a designated representative of each party, and we could, as a kind of executive group, get together sometime over the break, by conference call or whatever means, to review the next draft of this—say, sometime in mid-January—and just have a notion.
If we could get that online, then people could work with it in their own context. But in terms of recommendations, probably we will get to a point where we will look at a draft the first time we get back and there won't be a whole lot of recommendations yet, or only very tentative recommendations. We'll develop the report and see what recommendations we can bring out of it. I think it's best to get a consensus on the report first and then derive the recommendations from that report, just in the interests of time.