Clearly, wind energy is a very capital-intensive industry, and therefore, an initiative like that found in the budget--the extension of the 50% capital cost allowance in class 43.2 from 2012 to 2020--was a very important move from the perspective of the wind energy industry.
One of the challenges you face with tax-based measures, of course--and it's not an insurmountable challenge, but it's one that has to be considered--is that not everybody can take advantage of it. In fact, there are a number of wind developers that don't have, in essence, the tax appetite to make use of instruments like that.
One of the reasons the ecoENERGY for renewable power program is a very positive incentive program is that a broad range of different types of interests and corporate interests can actually participate in that program. So it is very positive. There are limitations within class 43.2 as well. There is a specified energy company rule that limits even a little bit further who can take advantage of that initiative.
So there are design issues that I think people will be interested in discussing in terms of how to ensure that tax-based measures can reach the broadest range of potential participants as possible.