With regard to climate change, from listening to Mr. Elston’s comments, I gather that the group thinks we are in a transition period. I find that very interesting. In the past, climate change was not given the same importance as it is today. Demographic and economic growth have necessarily given rise to an increase in greenhouse gases. Did we used to have the technology required? In any case, the standards set were not met.
Given that this problem is currently in the spotlight, do we have all the technologies required to assess the situation better, considering that there will necessarily be demographic and economic growth? No one is against economic growth.
I am referring more particularly to page 28, where it talks about the scenarios envisaged. According to the group, what would be a realistic scenario?
Second, on page 34, it says that public support is needed so that everything can run smoothly for everyone involved, with regard to the environment, energy efficiency, energy producers, etc. I feel that industry is ready. In fact, you write that industry is prepared to fall into step and do its part. I think that it is making efforts now. I would like some clarifications in this connection.
As for the government’s leadership role in getting the message across, as you say, what do you expect in concrete terms? Earlier someone mentioned data-gathering by Statistics Canada, but some points remain a bit vague in my mind. I would like to know your opinion on this, since this is a sensitive matter in the public opinion. I think that your observations might be very useful in this regard.
Thank you.