I think it's pretty fair to say that each of us representing our industry, coming together on this, recognizes that we can play a role. Obviously, nuclear has an interesting role to play with respect to emissions, but I think the one thing that we haven't really chatted too much about, although we're getting there in hinting a little bit at it, is that we shouldn't be necessarily looking at our current mix of any of the generation types of technology, which Hans has identified, and advances in the technologies will probably make some gains for us. We will be looking I think more securely at competitiveness for things like hydrogen, for instance, as we move further into a higher level of cost associated with some of our fossils.
I think we tend to look too closely to today. If this committee can have a bit of a longer-term strategic orientation that helps us move into some of that transition, we will I think measure our progress on climate change in a bit of a different way than we tend to look at it today. Obviously, action, contribution, and transition are the three key areas.