We talked about energy efficiency, and I want to get back to that because I think it's important, because lowering demand is the ultimate objective we want to achieve. We know that we want to try to cut down the administrative overhead or burden on these programs, so when your department is evaluating some of these programs, what kinds of numbers is it looking at when it draws a line that says a program is effective and cost-effective? What kind of overhead percentage do you think is realistic for us to invest in from an administrative standpoint, before a program makes the cut?
On June 8th, 2006. See this statement in context.