Oh, sorry. Yes.
Now that I've seen the actual wording of it, I do have a bigger problem, and that is with the way it's worded. It does not say “unless the substantive motion relates directly to the business under consideration”, and that would mean it's at the discretion of the chair or in the interpretation of the chair of this motion, which could be anybody's, I guess. The way it's written, it really doesn't say that the substantive motion relates directly to the business, so that would mean we would have to give 48 hours' notice for every motion, even for business of the committee that we're dealing with. So I would have a problem with that, and I wouldn't be supporting it.
I don't have too much problem with 48 hours' notice. I do have a problem with the calculation of it, but if instead of 24 it said 48 and then the rest of the language we're already using, I'm fine with that.