Thank you very much for the question, Mr. Chair. There were actually three comments in there, but I'll deal with the last, which is a question.
The Significant Development Report was reporting the state of risk to people and risk to the environment because of the situation that occurred at that time. Because the reactor was in shutdown state when the Significant Development Report was done and when it came to the commission meeting of the six, it wasn't a hazard to people or a hazard to the environment, because it was closed down. So that was the assessment of the staff at the time.
If the reactor had been in a different state, there would have been a different reaction. But it wasn't a hazard to people or the environment at that time because it was shut down.