We're getting into documentation that I don't have in front of me, so it's difficult to respond to it in a proper manner. But I think what's important is that the reactor was operating safely, and everybody agrees with that.
On the question of the licensing basis, we have clear documentation and support for the fact that we were operating not only safely but within our licensing envelope. But I expect more from my organization. If you're asking if I am dissatisfied that these upgrades, these connections to the pumps, were not done in a more timely manner, I absolutely am. I've been consistent in saying that since the evening of December 11.
If there was a misunderstanding, that's part of the lesson that needs to come out of this that both ourselves and CNSC staff have to engage in, because this didn't need to happen. At some point it became an issue, and the correspondence led us to believe that we were forthright in describing the state of the facility. We didn't try to misdirect or mislead about that at all. It was clear in the minds in my organization that the commitment was to install the seven safety systems upgrades and connect EPS to those other safety system upgrades. Within my organization, the connections to pumps 4 and 5 were seen to be an enhancement. The correspondence that flowed back and forth tended to reinforce that.