Let me help you clarify by noting that the fact that the risk is low is known to CNSC. It is actually part of the safety analysis report and the safety envelope of the plant that was licensed by the CNSC. The CNSC is absolutely aware of the point I'm making, and it is a very low risk. That is the basis for the continued operation of the nuclear reactor. To help you, what I've tried to characterize in my remarks is, let's make a clear understanding between what is a substantive nuclear safety question versus what is a licensing condition type of interpretation. I think it is in the latter part that things went awry.
On February 7th, 2008. See this statement in context.