I would agree that the importance of this kind of discussion is to ensure that we learn from the experience. That certainly has been the approach of my department.
But I can tell you that the guidance document you refer to speaks against intervening in a particular case and on behalf of an individual constituent or an individual interest group. I want to be very clear that the calls that were made by my minister to the head of CNSC were in the public interest. It was not to direct in any way the outcome of the decision, but instead to encourage action because of the urgency of the health situation in Canada. There was no pressure to make a particular decision, and the guidance refers to intervening on a particular decision.
There is room for communication always between ministers and quasi-judicial tribunals on the administrative matters of how efficiently the overall system is working. In this case, the issue was whether we could expedite a convening of the commission to secure—