I wanted to focus my question more on innovation and forestry development. As you know, according to some studies now under way, if buildings were heated with green energy produced from forestry byproducts, more energy would be generated and perhaps less CO2 would be emitted than if ethanol were produced from the same byproducts. On the one hand, it's simple if only one place is being heated. CO2 can be eliminated from furnaces. Or heat can be generated through electricity. However, when ethanol is produced, it is impossible, as you know, to capture the CO2 from each exhaust pipe, which means that large quantities of CO2 are emitted, both during the production process and during actual usage.
Have any studies been done that might help the government make some decisions? Forestry companies will continue to be paid the same price for forest byproducts, whether or not they are used to produce electricity or ethanol. We know this for a fact.
Do you help the government make decisions about innovative initiatives to deal with climate change?