But AECL has a certain narrative or agenda. The regulator is regulating AECL, and the minister is supposed to be ensuring that AECL performs well and also complies with the regulator. You don't see at all that your presence in this conversation between the minister and the regulator, or the commissioner or the president of the nuclear safety regulator, puts you in any position of at least perceived conflict of interest?
AECL certainly was lobbying for restarting the reactor, and the commissioner was saying, “No, you are violating your licence.” The minister was trying to find a way—at least he told us—to bring these two sides together. But your appointment to the AECL board certainly creates a perception of conflict of interest.