You raised a good question on certification. Obviously if there's one standard, it's a lot easier for the market to deal with than if there are three or four. I think over time we'll find that there will be a lead standard. The one of choice with our partners is the Forest Stewardship Council, for two obvious reasons. One is that it mandates third-party monitoring and verification of a forestry operation, and the second is that the standard was developed with a very broad consultative process, from first nations to industry to environmental groups. There is the greatest faith in its ability to actually deliver real results, and that's what they selected.
In terms of Ontario's decision to support the FSC paper, they have said they will procure up to 30% of government paper supplies from FSC producers. There are actually many acres under FSC production in Ontario, and Tembec is leading on that. Our producers are confident they can meet the supply or they wouldn't have encouraged Ontario to adopt that policy.
In terms of certification, when you certify the forest, how do you get it to market? Our partners are putting their cards.... And this goes for the forestry companies in FSC, because there are parties that are involved that help them get their paper and products to market. Those are very much the environmental groups that often put pressure on a retailer like Home Depot and encourage them to move forward. We have all these folks around our table, and as you can imagine, the conversations can get very interesting. What's happening is that former opponents are supporting moving in the same direction.
Does that answer your question?