Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I think Mr. Anderson's suggestion is interesting, but I am more in favour of having a short report on atomic energy, even though this will make things more difficult for the drafters. However, they could put aside the drafting of the report and rather write a preliminary report. They would have two weeks to do that.
I am now convinced that enough time will have gone by between the time we heard about the atomic energy situation and our next discussion of it that we will have rather forgotten what we heard. I think it is more urgent to draft a report on atomic energy than on forestry. The researchers could then take the time to write a preliminary report on forestry.
As an architect, I always tried to order my projects. It is not impossible to do this otherwise, but I think sequencing things makes more sense. I think it is more logical to work on a report now. Once we have finished hearing from our witnesses on forestry, we can complete our report on atomic energy. Then we could do the other report.