Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to preface this by explaining to the committee and to you what the intent of this motion is.
Several weeks ago I spoke with the clerk and the researchers about developing some kind of report as an outcome of the study we conducted on AECL's NRU reactor and nuclear safety. I was informed that since we had not specifically said that we would have needed a report, a lot of the notes were not recorded as such, and no preparatory work was done.
So I thought, out of my desire to ensure that the study and the time we devoted to doing that study don't go to waste, I would instigate a smaller report. Ever since I tabled my motion, there have been some discussions with my colleagues in committee. And I think there is a desire, a consensus, that perhaps we should see if the researchers and the analysts can draft a report, perhaps a smaller report. If that's the case, I certainly support that, and I don't have a problem, because my whole intention was to ensure that at least the House and the public and the government are informed of the study we've conducted and of our recommendations. I'd hate to see that go to waste.
If that's the case, I wouldn't mind tabling my motion until we come up with that report. So perhaps we should see if we can develop a consensus on that.