I'd say that to keep it simple we need to complete a protected areas network in this country, control areas where we are not exploiting the resource, that are left in a wild state so we can study how natural forests work under climate change scenarios, provide places for wildlife to continue to live, and lower our harvest levels to that conservative benchmark. What that would be would depend on where you are in the country. But this is broadly recognized to be a problem. Quebec has very much addressed the issue of overharvest; too high a harvest level can't be sustained. In British Columbia, given what's happened to their forest, given the pine beetle outbreak, they're talking about the same thing: lower harvest levels, more areas that are off limits to industrial activity period. So you have some resilience built into the system.
On March 6th, 2008. See this statement in context.