I just want to make a general remark. One of the things I really dislike about this place—this place being Parliament Hill—is the number of times we have to vote on things where we really have no idea what we're voting on. It's just the sheer volume of it. I don't know a single member of Parliament who reads every piece of legislation they've ever voted on. Considering that another committee has dealt with this, I don't see the difference between one committee, two committees, three committees, or four committees voting on it.
I'm assuming that the minister made the proper decision. It's a good Conservative government. I'm assuming that whoever votes for this is endorsing Conservative government decisions—good and excellent. But I really don't know one way or the other. To actually vote on this with any ability or sense, I'd need to actually have witnesses and so forth. I was talking to a member of the industry committee to get some background on this the other day.
So I think voting on motions on which we really don't have a background is sort of useless, particularly if they've been done at other committees.
There doesn't seem to be anything too bad with the motion. It congratulates and supports the minister. I can't argue with that. But other than that, this doesn't make sense to me.