If that's your line of thinking, consider that in 2003, Natural Resources Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission did a study on what the potential impacts would be and what the potential loss would be if there was an accident. I'm sure you're familiar with the study. It said an accident could range from $1 million to $100 million, depending on the time period, although in a highly populated area, it could go higher.
Well, if you're protecting your rate payers, then why aren't you arguing for an amount lower than $650 million?