If you will consider the financial arrangements that are being made as a package in any event, I don't quite understand why you set 50% in legislation or otherwise. I think it's much easier to be flexible. You don't have to change the legislation every time there is an alternate financial arrangement brought from the market to the minister for approval. So I think in some ways it's a redundancy, if the minister has to approve it anyway.
On November 27th, 2007. See this statement in context.