The issue I'm having a bit of a problem grasping is that, according to my notes, we were looking at 2000. I can see 2001 or 2002. This was six years later. Was it just that everyone kept thinking, “Well, one more minor tweak, one more minor tweak”? You can say that for one or two or three years, but not six. That's more than the length of time, really, of the original estimate; we had already gone double the length of time. To a layman, that's beginning to raise a few red flags.
On June 10th, 2008. See this statement in context.