I will pick up on Mr. West's comment.
I think that as we look at the MAPLE project now, there were a number of different factors that played into this, and it really wasn't until 2003 that the power coefficient issue emerged as another technical issue that needed resolution. It had been characterized very early on as something that would be resolvable, frankly, in a matter of weeks.
So when you take a look at the question of whether or not this was a high risk, it was obviously not deemed to be a high risk. As this was going on, there were other issues still emerging on the project. So we shouldn't characterize the MAPLE reactors as having only a power coefficient issue that needed to be resolved. We had the best reactor experts in the world designing and building these facilities, which were going to be dedicated solely for isotope production.