Speaking for myself, sir, and the advisory panel of professors with whom I sit, who advise the board of directors of AECL, I think we came to the conclusion that there were some serious difficulties here probably around about 2006, when we did a detailed review of what had happened up till then and a detailed technical review of all that had gone on to that point.
We advised AECL's board of directors at that time that the things they were doing and the process they were following were, in our view, the right things to do, given the circumstances. They were doing a very detailed analysis, seeking expert help from outside, setting up a series of tests, which had started by then, to get to the bottom of it. So they were certainly following the right path, but we also looked at the chances of in fact coming up with a result that wasn't satisfactory. That was clearly a possibility in 2006, in our view, in terms of the advisory panel.