Gentlemen, you're pretty moderate fellows. I was very surprised when I heard that AECL was not continuing with the MAPLE project. I don't have a dollar invested. I can only imagine your shock at being told on May 16 that MAPLE was history.
By that point, you had been involved in a series of meetings with AECL. There was nothing in any of those meetings that caused you to believe that the project, even though it had troubles, was going to be totally scuttled. It almost seems to me as though on May 16 the decision to get out of the MAPLE reactor business was imposed upon AECL and that the decision was then conveyed to you.
Is that a fair read or not?