From the outset, I don't think we ever saw this project as a high-risk project. We would never have invested the amount of time and money in the project if we didn't think it was going go be completed. When we mediated the new agreement with AECL in 2006, I have to say they felt very confident that, despite the issues they had, they were very capable of resolving these issues.
So in terms of quantifying the risk of the project, our position was that we thought we had invested enough of our shareholders' money in the project. We also believed that AECL should take ownership and finish the project. They assured us they could do that. Otherwise, I think, we would have gone down a different path. But AECL was very clear with us--and that's just two years ago--that they would complete the project, and they would complete it on time.