First of all, I would just make a correction, if I may, madame. The problem first appeared in 2003 as a result of the commissioning tests. At that point AECL--and indeed, if I had been looking at it in 2003--came to the conclusion that we would go through a process and we would solve this issue. So in 2003 there was absolutely no doubt in AECL's mind, and I think in most observers' minds, that we had a technical problem--a surprise--that, with due diligence and care, we would be able to solve.
I don't think the doubts about the solution really came to the fore until 2006 or 2007, when the test results became more understood. We were getting an understanding of only about half the problem. The full realization that we really were in a difficult spot because we had only been able to identify half the cause came in April of this year.
In answer to your question about what if I had invested $350 million, as a private citizen I don't have that, but as a taxpayer in 2003, I would have thought it was a good investment. Canada has the work on it, has the business.
In 2006 we were looking at the situation. We could see that things weren't going quite as well as they should have been by then, and we thought we should start looking a little further down the road. I guess the full realization came in 2008.