No, but that's not what I'm saying. Perhaps I can clarify.
I don't mean necessarily related to clause-by-clause, but related to some of the testimony we have heard with respect to, for example, risk assessment. On what basis was the $650,000 established? There was some conjecture that it was enough, that it was not enough, that not enough administrative due diligence was done, and so on.
Those are of a general nature. They're not specific to clause-by-clause, Mr. Chairman.