On a point of order, in order to be fair to the witnesses, they were called here under the understanding that we were doing clause-by-clause. That's why they're here.
A lot of the testimony we heard earlier didn't have to do specifically with the bill. I'm not sure it's fair to our witnesses who are here today to expect them to able to respond to that. I'm not sure they were even here for the testimony.
If we're going to deal directly with the bill, I think that's fair to them. Otherwise I don't think it is.