I'll try to summarize it and I'll try to do it justice. It was written by Gowling on behalf of Westinghouse. Their concern is that the word damage is used in various sections in this act but meaning different things at times, sometimes injury, sometimes bodily injury or physical injury.
They are suggesting it's leaving a lot of ambiguity and a lot of room for interpretation, and they're asking that it be redrafted and revised as necessary to, as they put it, “eliminate any ambiguity as to the intended scope of liabilities for losses, and exclusions from liabilities for losses, under the Act”.