In terms of terrorism, there is no test of negligence. What the legislation puts in place is that the operator is absolutely liable, so if there is an act of terrorism that causes nuclear damage, there is no question. The operator is liable and there is no need to suggest that he was negligent in his operations. He is absolutely liable for all damages.
The issue, however, is that the insurers are unwilling at this time to provide 100% of the coverage. Their coverage is limited to 20%, and we are seeking to increase the coverage that they provide.