Good.
My second question has to deal with clause 6, about having to compare things with those in Mexico and the United States. Now, as I read the clause, it's more for demonstrative purposes. There's no real change of Canadian standards, if, say, we're different from Mexico or Chihuahua or who knows whatever else we may be comparing ourselves to.
My question is, assuming I've read that correctly, do we have any idea how much this would cost? How does the minister “demonstrate the extent”? When you say “demonstrate”, you're not talking to a lawyer here; you're talking to a geophysicist. I could use that word flexibly, and it could drive the costs either up or down. I'm a little concerned this could end up being spent bureaucracy money, useless stuff, with which people could be doing more efficient projects. How are we going to keep this from being a waste of money and just sort of a useless PR exercise?