The question as to the implications of our regulatory regime from a trade perspective has been posed before, and we have talked on particular issues with Foreign Affairs on that. With that there are two particular aspects that arise. The first is that you're generally okay if you treat everybody the same, so we don't provide national treatment for any of these products. It doesn't matter where they come from. We can demonstrate that a one-watt standard is a one-watt standard for something Korean, and it's a one-watt standard for something that's traded from Brantford to Montreal. That is the primary thing that the trade legislation is trying to make sure doesn't happen.
The second thing is that within most trade legislation—and I'm sure our counsel will correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure about it—this legislation generally falls under environmental legislation. The rationale is greenhouses gases. And then there are exceptions with respect to countries having different regimes or different standards to achieve their own environmental perspectives.
So on those two cases, we have a pretty strong case, and we're not too worried about it.