Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you, Madam Minister, for appearing. Pardon me for interrupting on that point of order to figure out how the rules would work today. I'm pleased to have that clarification.
One of the issues you talked about was AECL, of course, in Chalk River, which has been topical of late for a lot of us. The briefing note by the committee researcher indicated that there wasn't new funding for AECL in the supplementaries; however, there was $351 million, of course, mentioned in the budget. The question is really whether AECL has enough resources to accomplish its mission.
The other question is this: where is that money meant to be spent? Is it true that the $351 million includes $135 million for the advanced CANDU reactor, or the ACR-1000, $72 million to decommission the two MAPLE reactors at Chalk River, and $144 million to maintain safe and reliable operations at Chalk River Laboratories?