If you take a look at the three reports from CNSC, AECL, and the officials, which have been tabled in Parliament, it does indicate that while there is reporting among the organizations, there was no reporting to the public of this leak. The reason they've indicated there was no public reporting of the incident is that it was determined at the time, and has turned out to be true, that there was no risk to the public or the environment, so the CNSC—which is the third-party regulatory agency, the tribunal that's meant to have the mandate to ensure the health, safety, and protection of the environment and the Canadian people with respect to nuclear management, and that is foremost in their minds— didn't deem the reporting to the public as necessary. Since then, after the reports had been tabled, after understanding and listening to the concerns that have been expressed, they have indicated they will be committing to increase their disclosure regarding such non-routine events.
At the time, as I indicated, two things were going on. One had to do with the heavy water leak. The other had to do with the effect of the leak, which was the NRU not operating. That communication strategy was fully employed and people were made aware of the medical isotope shortage at the time, and we addressed it at the time as well.