I'm just going to make sure I'm referring to the exact timing and the dates you asked for, Mr. Regan.
With respect to the water leak itself, as I indicated in the House, I was made aware of the fact that there was a leak and that as a result the reactor would not be restarted as they investigated where the leak came from. The leak was subsequently repaired and the NRU came up in production at that time, and we focused on making sure the medical community also was made aware of the fact that the medical isotopes would be at a lower level of availability, as they had in the past. And we communicated that to the appropriate people.
With respect to the reports, they were tabled on February 5. I guess I had asked for the reports soon thereafter, when I indicated in the House that I'd be asking for the reports. In fact, I asked for the reports from the officials instantaneously thereafter. They were delivered in three pieces, one from CNSC, one from AECL, and one from NRCan officials. The result of it was that, having looked at all the reports and analyzing both the chronology of what had happened and the reporting that had gone through and the cooperation and the communication—which was very good between AECL and CNSC and NRCan—there was good communication on the issues. But AECL, in cooperation with the CNSC, will introduce voluntary disclosure of reportable events at the Chalk River labs on a going-forward basis, and in fact on February 19 AECL will be at a hearing with CNSC and will be speaking more about disclosure of events at Chalk River.