But this report looks at the strategic direction and highlights the points you just made, doesn't it, even though the financial climate or the economic climate has changed? Although I may stand corrected, the report is supposed to provide a strategic outlook: aside from the economic considerations, it's also supposed to give you input and feedback about how you see your capacity in government and how you see the future direction of AECL.
The fact that it's been almost over a year and that you've made these additional commitments in the budget pertaining to AECL puts the report into question, in the sense that it raises the question of whether the report is relevant now or whether these investments will undermine it. I think an ambiguity exists there. We're patiently waiting for this report to become public, but at the same time there are significant investments made in AECL. We can't reconcile both of those. That's where we want clarification.