It's good to hear that the steps taken by the government and the various departments over the last 18 months have paid off.
Out of curiosity, one thing I noted is that most of the nuclear medical procedures that were referred to today are diagnostic in nature. I understand, even though I'm nowhere close to being a doctor, that diagnosis is important before you get to treatment. But I want to know, for people watching, because there may be some misperceptions that people may be missing their treatments out there in Canada, that by and large it is on the diagnostic side that we will be rationing, because that's where we can do substitutions.
Would that not be a correct analysis? Even without the NRU, 60% of the world's production is still going to be there. So for 60% of procedures, we wouldn't have to ration, we wouldn't have to squeeze timelines, we wouldn't have to do anything. Am I making the correct assumption that it's going to be mostly diagnostics and the less critical diagnostics that will be the ones first substituted for?