That's a very good question. Let me start with the first part of your question. One example of efforts being made to achieve greater substitutability was actually announced about 10 days ago by Lantheus, to say that they had now secured an agreement with NTP of South Africa and had made arrangements to be able to take the South African product in order to produce the generators for the North American market. We consider that to be a positive development, because heretofore Lantheus had been fully dependent on the NRU, and 85% of the Canadian market was supplied by Lantheus. We had the Canadian market fully dependent, basically, on the NRU. This has now provided a bit of diversification for the Canadian market. That was a helpful development, but it did require some work between NTP and Lantheus to achieve that capacity to take that product.
With regard to your second question, indeed the discussions to date with the Dutch in particular have been very promising in that regard. They are making efforts to ramp up their production capacity by about 50%, and that will certainly be of assistance in helping to alleviate some of the shortages that are inevitable with the outage of the NRU. So we are getting those kinds of responses, certainly from at least some of the reactor owners, and I think there is also responsiveness through the supply chain. There are, however, some regulatory constraints and others that provide that they cannot always operate at capacity. There have to be some outages of those reactors for simple maintenance, sometimes some short outages and sometimes some more extended outages. But yes, the Dutch have been forthcoming, and they recognize the efforts that Canada has made, and I think they consider it now to be their responsibility to do the same thing.