My understanding of what happened was that AECL proposed to reopen, to restart, and there was a kind of a leaning of the regulator towards allowing them to reopen. But how the mechanism of this reluctance was transmitted wasn't formal and wasn't through the normal commission work. You have to understand that normal commission work is a public hearing. We issue a decision in writing, and that's the law of the land.
On June 4th, 2009. See this statement in context.