I think what I really need to do is turn back to some of the comments I just made.
Until the decision was made to terminate the MAPLE program, it was very clear that the investment being made to bring that facility into service was indeed the plan AECL had to continue isotope production. So without question, our world changed when it became evident that we needed to take a different direction from that one.
We have embarked upon what I consider to be the most expeditious plan available to us: first, ensure that the NRU is suitable for service in the near term and the medium and longer terms, beyond its licence expiry in 2011; and second, as was just announced, examine fully all the alternatives that exist for a long-term isotope supply solution for Canada, and indeed the globe.