Thank you, Mr. Chair.
There are a couple of questions I would like to ask. I'm trying to sum this up in terms of the alternatives out there. What I'm hearing is that with the PET we can probably get to 20% or maybe 25% of our requirements, and I'm assuming also, with the other existing technologies we have today, that perhaps with some investment in it we could probably replace some other isotope usage in our system.
Is it a fair statement that we could do that rather than build a new reactor?