Thank you very much, Chair.
My question is to Dr. Gulenchyn, and it's with respect to the government's plan. We've talked about it extensively today. In the past 18 months they've deployed various initiatives, but it was predicated under the notion that there would be a short-term temporary reduction in supply. As we see today unfolding, it seems it will be much more prolonged. There doesn't seem to be a plan per se for a prolonged shortage of isotopes, and we know the history at Chalk River.
This plan pertains only to a specific scenario, which is not necessarily the scenario we're dealing with today. Is that a fair characterization?