I think that was the model I was using. I imagine the accelerators play a role of supporting the supply of molybdenum to Canada, so if you were relying on a reactor or a group of reactors—they could be U.S. reactors—then you would always have a fallback position with something that's able to supply Canada's needs. The accelerator proposal does not put Canada in a position where they would supply isotopes to the world. It's not intended to do that.
But you could, for example, put accelerators in the U.S. You could put them in Boston, you could put them in L.A., and do local regions that way. That's the model, really, with accelerators, because they're small.