My answer will be a bit different. I think we actually don't know how big a hole there is going to be when the NRU is closed down as a research reactor. My view was that when we lost the position of chief science advisor--Arthur Carty had occupied that spot--we really lost the ability for all of Canada, including parliamentarians, to be able to ask the questions as to what we should be investing in and where we should be investing, and with complete respect to my fellow presenters today, I think there's a tendency for all institutions to look at their own institutions and to not have that broad picture.
The answer is I don't think we really know what the gaps are and how to solve them. For instance, the U.K. and the U.S. both have chief science advisors, and I think providing those has been really worth every penny. As a small country, we need that. I don't really think we know exactly what the answer will be.
In terms of its safety, the role of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is to ensure that anything that happens in terms of the decommissioning happens safely, and I'm sure they will do that.