I actually would like to follow up on that point, then, because earlier you had talked about wanting regulatory inflexibility removed. Did I hear that wrong? I think both you and Mr. Nathwani said you wanted the regulatory inflexibility removed. Mr. Nathwani said the only thing holding us up is a small technical problem. But what you've just said seems to me to be the opposite side, and I would say a more reasonable opinion to take: if you can't get reliable predictions at one area, how do you know you have them at any other area?
On June 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.