It just seems that our information has been that actually it was predicted that there wouldn't be one, and then there was one. That was really the issue, not the fact that there could or couldn't be, although that may be an issue with the regulator, as well. The real issue was the divergence of the two things.
I would like to go to something else.
Dr. Smith, you talked about the HANARO fuel being similar and about being able to switch over, basically, that reactor to the MAPLE. We had testimony earlier that the main driver fuel is similar, but it certainly would not be a simple process to change a reactor like that over to create the isotopes. You would have to do a new analysis of fuel and those kinds of things. I'm just wondering whether you have any comment on that. Dr. Waddington seemed to think that this would be a long process. There would have to be a lot of analysis done in order to switch that over. Is that accurate?