Yes, I just wanted a clarification on something, and this is what I wanted to ask last time as well. I know this was mentioned before, but I want further clarification on this here.
On one hand, you have the Prime Minister saying that we're no longer going to be in the isotope business; you have the minister saying that they want to seriously entertain the MAPLE reactor option; and then you've clearly indicated your position here.
Which one should Canadians believe? In a serious matter like this, people are trying to figure out a solution and they're getting mixed signals at a political level and from AECL. So how do people reconcile this? How does one go about saying what makes sense now? That's where I think a lot of the confusion lies.