Thank you, Steve.
I think that with the MAPLE projects, looking at how they're restarted would be the key to answering that question. There are a number of different proposals before the expert panel that envision different ways of restarting the MAPLE reactors. There are different potential ways of operating them, potentially operating them at reduced power, operating them with the safety case and a positive PCR instead of a negative PCR, modifying the actual reactors in cells to achieve the negative PCR.
Depending on which approach you take, they would have different timelines and different costs. The approach that we put forward was not to make any physical changes but to look at changing the software, using the South African nuclear association. That would be less expensive, and we hope would be able to be achieved in less than 24 months. But one of the keys is that with any of these proposals we'd need to get access to the technical information to make that final assessment, in order to be able to give that particular number.
At this point in time, it's not known, but there are some proposals with some estimates put forward.