The organization pointed out that in the early 1990s.... In fact, the organization pointed out that AECL was put together, that there were two separate organizations. There was a perceived inefficiency of operating two separate organizations that were both integrally required for a successful nuclear operation.
When you combine that with the story they tell of what happened with Ontario Hydro when it was broken up and the ineffectuality that resulted, doesn't that concern you when you look at what's being proposed for AECL? Or can we simply dismiss this?