Let me tread this one cautiously, Mr. Chair. It's an important question. I'm not the expert, so I really want to preface it that way.
I think there is certainly a counter-argument to this notion we hear that CANDU is a proliferating technology. CANDU technology is, in many ways, safer than other technologies. It does not require the enrichment of uranium. At least the CANDU reactors that have been sold to date--the CANDU 6, for example, is in Korea, China, Romania, and Argentina--do not require the enrichment of uranium. Through the process of enrichment there is a greater potential source of nuclear materials for military purposes.
The installations, obviously, are under IEA guidance and so forth. I think it would be worthwhile for the committee to hear from experts from the government in this regard. I agree with you; it's an important point. I think we actually have a good story to tell, better than what is maybe being told by some of the competitors.